Prepare a power point presentation of your individual project (max 10 min). Aim for a concise and well-structured presentation that brings forward a clear red thread between you aims, research questions, theory/concepts, methods, analysis and results.

At the final seminar, you will present your draft, after which your assigned peers will discuss your draft based on the comments and questions they have prepared in advance. There will also be some time allocated for questions from the rest of the group (including one of the course coordinators). Each draft session will follow this time-schedule:

1. Presentation of the third, final draft - 10 minutes

2. Comments and discussion by your feedback group - 10 minutes

3. Time for additional questions and comments - 5 minutes

Prepare comments and questions in relation to the two final drafts from your feedback group. When preparing your comments, focus on the content rather than the formalia of the report. Try to formulate your critique in the form of questions that can be put to the author (thereby inviting the author to a discussion/dialogue rather than simply stating your critique). Put your comments/questions in the order you want to prioritize them, in order to make sure that you ask the most important ones within the time allocated to you (7-8 minutes). A common way of doing this is to start with one more general comment/question on the draft as a whole, and then proceed with 2-3 questions/comments on separate sections/issues in the report. Another tip for your task as a reviewer is to try to think of ways of addressing the weaknesses/gaps/problems that your comments/questions bring forward. It is by doing this that you increase the constructiveness of your critique (simply pointing out a weakness or a problem may not in itself be all that helpful). And lastly, any comments/questions that you don't get time to raise during the seminar can be shared with the author after the seminar, orally or in writing.